When the words of a person need to be reproduced in a document, both direct and indirect styles are used, most of
the time alternatively or interlaced. Using only (or very much) direct style in a literary document results in
cryptic meanings, because direct style is not able to express interior feelings, thoughts, and reasons.
Of course, direct style is more accurate, and it is used preferentially in official papers. In literary works,
however, indirect style takes precedence since it is a lot more rich in expression, in addition to just reporting
the facts.
Direct style is relatively easy to implement: the words are reproduced exactly using quotes. Indirect style
requires few particular transformations, in order to reproduce the words and the actions as accurate and
consistent as possible.
The structure employed to present direct and indirect style in this page is:
1. Defining Direct and Indirect Styles
2. Transforming Direct Style to Indirect Style
3. Particular Instances
|
ATTENTION
These Grammar Notes are not sufficient to understand the topics presented. For accurate and detailed
information we recommend Logically Structured English Grammar book.
|
The words of a person (character) may be reproduced in writing, in two modes:
1. as direct sentences, or paragraphs;
2. as (complex) sentences subordinated to a declarative verb: to say; to tell; etc
The first mode is specific to direct style.
Example:
Jane said, "Please, John, let's visit my mother."
Transforming direct style sentences into subordinate sentences results in indirect style.
Example:
Jane told John (that) she wanted to visit her
mother.
The verb used to introduce the subordinated sentence in indirect style is named the declarative verb.
Direct style is independent on the declarative verb. In indirect style, however, the declarative verb becomes a
tense-reference, therefore the sequence-of-tenses rules take control.
|
The method used to transform direct style into the indirect one works as follows:
1. we take the quotes out, and we introduce conjunction "that"--which could be implicit (missing)
in most instances;
2. Personal, possessive, and reflexive pronouns, and possessive adjectives are replaced by adequate forms,
depending on the meaning.
3. following, we have three instances of transformation scenarios.
SCENARIO 1
When the declarative verb is in present tense, then the tense of the verbs in direct style remain unchanged.
Determinative adjectives and the adverbs remain also unchanged.
Examples:
John says (to Jane): "I want to talk to you."
(direct style)
John tells Jane (that) he wants to talk
to her. (indirect style)
SCENARIO 2
When the declarative verb is in past tense, all verbs in direct style are replaced by corresponding past
forms.
Fragment from LSEG.

|
Determinative
adjectives and adverbs expressing proximity, are replaced by forms showing distance. Following is a fragment
from LSEG.

|
Examples:
John said: "Jane is coming now." (direct style)
John said (that) Jane was coming then.
(indirect style)
|
SCENARIO 3
When the declarative verb is in future tense, all verbs in direct style remain unchanged.
Examples:
John will say: "I can finish this Project, because I am well
trained for this."
John will say (that) he can finish
that project because he is well trained for that.
|
Few particular instances require different modes of implementation than it is presented in the above
scenarios:
1. interrogative sentences
2. direct style sentences having strong emphatic content
3. direct style sentences having a past tense verb followed by a present tense one
4. direct style sentences containing the auxiliary verbs "shall" and "will"
5. direct style sentences containing defective modal verbs
6. direct style sentences containing imperative verbs
7. direct style sentences containing the adverbs "yes" and "no"
8. using the verb "to say" and synonyms in indirect style
9. handling idiomatic expressions in indirect style
|
 |
LINKS
|
|
 |
| Back
to GRAMMAR main page |
 |
 |
Send
your comments regarding this page using support@corollarytheorems.com
Page last updated on: January 30, 2008
© Corollary Theorems Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
 |
|

|
Page valid according to W3C
|
|
|