From A
B - Florida, USA
"... I feel more confused about using comma now, after reading the LSEG book. I do
realize I have to read it a few more times before being able to control comma appropriately. For the time
being I am still confused, and my question to you is: do we have to use comma according to all grammatical rules
or not?"
In 1970, Mr. Erich Segal published the book "Love Story", and that represents a
turning-point in North American literature. The book itself is a little sweet nothing written in short, simple
sentences, only it became an overnight "best-seller". The second result
was, almost any true
editor in the publishing industry started on a new career as an author. [It is very easy to write stories of the
type: John loves Jane, and Jane loves John; Jane/John dies, and John/Jane is left alone; John/Jane needs to find
another Jane/John adequately fit for his/her great love/passion.] Anyway,
since they were
well known names in the publishing
industry, the new wave of authors were immediately published, and the benefits
were very good for
all parties
involved.
Further, the publishing companies were left without true
good editors. What they did was,
they started employing people having little knowledge of English in general, and of grammar in particular.
Now, the new generation of "editors" started promoting the "new style" of writing
in English: short sentences, containing very simple ideas. Their motivation was:
"the readers"
know little English, therefore the books need to be 'easy to read' without stressing anybody". Of course
the readers do know very little grammar but, if we pamper them, they will never learn anything.
Today, the few existing good ex-editors make excellent profits working for themselves
as authors. In the same time, the
great and small publishing houses still do not have good/capable editors employed; therefore, the "telegraphic
style" they impose in (North American) English literature is still in full effect. However, regardless of
what the publishing industry wants and promotes today, any true literary creation, in any language, has to have a
certain degree of complexity--which is way above the average. A book written in simple words/ideas is always going
to be just an average, poor creation.
Another interesting aspect is the apparition of the grammar-check software programs: all
of them work based on "simplifying"
complex sentences, expressions, and ideas. "Simple" in literature means poor literary style. As it was
stated in LSEG, no computer software is ever going to master English grammar as people are able to do it. Our
life, our society, our science, and the environment in which we live are such complex systems, that using
"plain words", and short, "simple sentences" is not going to help anybody achieve anything.
The above very long introduction was needed to highlight the idea: orthographical/punctuation marks are the
tools we employ to help us structure complex grammatical structures and, implicitly, to clarify advanced,
complex ideas/topics. Comma is a very useful greatly needed tool: it does not bring ANY additional
complexity--on
the contrary. LSEG explains the use of comma to stress emotions, or the meaning of the words, in addition to
just structuring grammatically complex sentences.
Note that a comma may be used sometimes even contrary to the existing
grammatical rules. As long as a comma helps understanding/structuring the meaning,
never hesitate to use one. Give it just a little study time, and then
using comma in the right places is going to become even a pleasing
routine task!
|