Corollary Theorems: GRAMMAR FAQ

 

English Grammar Questions

Q2: Using Synthetic Genitive

 

 Back to GRAMMAR QUESTIONS:

 

Grammar Notes

 
  INTERESTING GRAMMAR QUESTIONS - Archive 1, Question 2

From Corollary Theorems

In our "Global Picture in News" page Week 4, 2007--sorry, we have deleted this page--you could discover a news highlight about the "Grammar Girl". It says in that article that Ms. Mignon Fogarty was asked by the U.S. Supreme Court of Justice to clarify on using either:

"Kansas' statute" or "Kansas's statute"

Ms. Fogarty said that both forms were correct, only she preferred leaving off the
extra "s"
[sic].


The answer Ms. Fogarty has provided to the U.S. Supreme Court of Justice is indeed "quick and dirty"--as she prefers to label it herself--and it is not correct. [No disrespect is intended here; on the contrary, we do appreciate a lot Ms. Mignon Fogarty's work. It is just that some of the words she uses are not quite ... appropriate.]

The correct answer is:
1. in writing, particularly in official papers, the correct grammatical form is: "Kansas's statute"--grammatical rules are perfectly clear on this aspect;
2. note that it is very difficult to read "Kansas's statute", therefore in spoken language people use "Kansas' statute". However, we can write "Kansas' statute" only in direct style, because spoken words need to be reproduced exactly in direct style.

The reasons behind using one form or the other are indeed complex issues, from multiple points of view. For example, the synthetic genitive form of the words above is not sufficient to clarify the problem because in many instances the most appropriate form is: "Kansas Statute"--this is similar to "the Ohio Amendment Act", "the USA Immigration Law", "the State of California Clean Air Act", etc. Without an apostrophe, both words form a compound-noun construction having exactly the same meaning as the genitival form.

ATTENTION
The compound-noun construction we refer to [Kansas Statute] is a bit more complex, because the word "Kansas" becomes in fact an attribute. For accurate details, please consult LSEG.


To conclude, the genitive form may be used grammatically, or "as it is spoken", in particular instances; the compound-noun[sic] construction alternative/option has a wider range of applications--these topics are presented perfectly clear in LSEG.

 

 


LINKS


 


MOST VISITED PAGES AT COROLLARY THEOREMS
 

1. LOGICALLY STRUCTURED ENGLISH GRAMMAR - if you think you know English grammar, think again
2. LEARN HARDWARE FIRMWARE AND SOFTWARE DESIGN - and develop your own commercial product!
3. AMAZING ARTICLES - our very History is the greatest SF story EVER!
4. NEWS - reality is never what it appears to be
5. GRAMMAR FAQ - submit an English grammar question to us


 
Back to GRAMMAR QUESTIONS
Grammar Notes
 

Send your comments regarding this page using support@corollarytheorems.com 
Page last updated on:
May 23, 2011
© SC Complement Control. All rights reserved.
 

Valid HTML 4.01!

Page valid according to W3C