Corollary Theorems: Amazing Articles Archive 4



Strange Facts and Amazing Articles
 

A39: Social Psychology - Inter-Communication
 


Back to Amazing Articles Main Page

Return to AMAZING ARTICLES main page
 


COROLLARY THEOREMS: Mathematics is built on two basic operations only
 

 A39: Social Psychology - Inter-Communication


Learn Hardware Firmware and Software DesignBoth articles A37 and A38 are an introduction to the present one. We suspect nobody was much impressed with either A37 or A38, although both are extremely important to highlight (graphically) the idea: "intelligence is structured in levels" regardless of what we like/want to consider. Anyway, time has come to explain to what are those levels good for.

Try to imagine that Level 0 of intelligence is the "animal", "instinctual", or totally "inhuman" one. Individuals on this level do what they "think" is good, meaning, they are capable of killing without remorse in order to satisfy their "needs/pleasures". Their mentality is targeted only towards "destruction"; note that no intelligence is needed when destroying anything.

Now, Level 10 of intelligence is the maximum possible. Specific to it is, the individuals are primarily characterized as being "creators"--this time we refer to the true, valuable creation. This people have the highest amount of "humanity", and that is the best indicator if you intend to "discover" them.

Level 5 of intelligence is not capable of creation but it does not want destruction either. The goal of Level 5 intelligence people is "sustainability": we are certain you heard a lot about this concept lately. In other words, the average intelligence people want the existing social state to perpetuate forever.

Level 10 of intelligence is great, but we can leave it safely aside since it creates no problems; the problems are created by people having low levels of intelligence. Suppose you are a good, solid Level 5 of intelligence, and you were assigned a task: you have to "talk" to a Level 0 intelligence person, and try to "educate" him to change his/her behavior. For example, to stop raping and killing children. History shows us that is not possible; pedophile people do not change their habits because the urge of their "desires" is stronger than their level of intelligence/moral.

The idea is, all your efforts of trying to educate a low level intelligence person are futile, because that person does not understand you. There is a terrible gap of missing intelligence between Level 5 and Level 0. What you name "immorality" makes no sense to a Level 0 person; in the same time, the animal "need" he feels is stronger than any moral, ever. The only way to change a Level 0 intelligence person is to act while he/she is very young, to impose some education hoping he/she will raise its intellectual level--therefore, he/she will start understanding little morality.

Logically Structured English Grammar
Now, in society, most people have average levels of intelligence. The gap in communication between Level 5 and Level 0 of intelligence is enormous, but the really interesting aspect is, the gap between Level 10 and Level 5 of intelligence is just as great! This is the great problem of our intelligent Human Species: it is extremely difficult to understand each other!

Think of this psychologically, from the Global Picture point of view. To a Level 0 person, books are not good for anything, except for using them as weapons to kill someone. To Level 5 intelligence people, books are good only if they are nicely presented, carefully edited, and well appraised by the entire press. The average people always take as good "what the average people say". To a Level 10 person, what the average people say or the form of the books are both meaningless. First of all, the average is a very low "standard", and then books may be scratched on stone, in burned mud, or painted on papyrus--that is totally not important. Only the amount of intelligence a book or a document contains is important.

Note that we used the extremes (Level 0, 5, and 10) to exemplify the theory, but the gap of missing intelligence between, say, Level 5 and Level 6 could be enormous. Because there is some (or a lot of) intelligence missing between intelligence Levels, people barely understand each other. Here comes the collective/social wish to raise the average social level of intelligence.

Our societies deal with very low levels of intelligence using the Justice systems, jails, and mental institutions. It is relatively easy to identify persons having very low levels of intelligence because their behavior is illogic, first of all. The real problem is the individuals having high levels of intelligence, because the society (the average) cannot understand them. To a Level 5 intelligence person, a Level 10 one is totally absurd, fantasist, and "strange/alien". Therefore, the persons having high levels of intelligence are never welcome among the average social people: they are ostracized and laughed at. That is the way things are, and it is impossible to change the average social mentality.

The real threat is, if social education becomes less stringent, then social average starts slipping down towards lower levels of intelligence. Further, the gap between real social average (RSA) and the maximum intelligence Level 10 increases/widens; therefore, intelligent ideas, concepts, and advices are rejected/(not understood) by society. In the same time, the gap between RSA and Level 0 of bestial/inhuman intelligence narrows, and "under average" intelligence people start having access to social mechanisms of control ...

In our human societies today, the average intelligence people control the highest social power positions, and they impose average measures of social government, which are not constructive. This is a time-degradation process; it may be sensed over periods of 10, 20, or 50 years. The result is, things are worse than they used to be. This degradation process generates social injustice, then revolutions, economic crises, and then wars appear at some point in history to change or to correct the existing social injustice.

SF BOOKS
Another interesting aspect is the Democratic Mechanism of Selection--described in MERCY. Due to the Democratic Mechanism of Selection, democratic societies (as we know them today) are doomed to end in auto-destruction (take this as social destruction), because they promote the under-average intelligence people (the opportunists) into the highest social power positions. Of course, there are ways to correct and limit the action of the Democratic Mechanism of Selection but, in order to find out about them, you will have to read our Science Fiction books--that's the way things are, dear friend. This brings some memories ...

Two things are worth mentioning related to the "pure" process of thinking during Hellenic Civilization--never matched since. First, the old Greek philosophers used a mental method named "catharsis" when they started a psychoanalysis process. That is a pure mental-logic state, and they achieved it using various, more or less personal, techniques, but all were related to art; this is pure art, in its most classic form or shape. That mental process is important for its "state": it exists! Please investigate this for yourself.

The second aspect is related to a social-psychology aspect. Great Hellenic dignitaries were told by their philosophy teachers--during those days all great people had personal philosophy teachers; for example, Alexander the Great had Aristotle as teacher and mentor (Aristotle was the brightest mind our civilization ever had)--to be followed by a servant who had the job to whisper into dignitary's ear, from time to time: "Memento mori". The English translation of the words is, "Remember you are going to die, one day". The words were needed to temper down excessive excitement, in order to keep the dignitaries into the optimum mental-logic state. Interesting, aye? 

Understanding the existing social levels of intelligence and the communication processes between them is extremely important--if you intend to make some sense of our chaotic, random reality. Now, you need to try to extend the simple concepts we have outlined above to your personal life and experience, in order to prove the theory through your "personal reality". When everything will be perfectly clear to you, you are going to open the "eyes of your mind". Then ...

***

First published on October 19, 2006 
© Corollary Theorems Ltd. All rights reserved.
 
 

LINKS TO OTHER PAGES

1. LEARN HARDWARE FIRMWARE AND SOFTWARE DESIGN - the easy way!
2. LOGICALLY STRUCTURED ENGLISH GRAMMAR - a must have.

Back to AMAZING ARTICLES Main Page
 
Return to AMAZING ARTICLES main page
 
Send your comments regarding this page using support@corollarytheorems.com 
Page last updated on:
October 28, 2007
© Corollary Theorems Ltd. All rights reserved.
 

Valid HTML 4.01!

Page valid according to W3C