Strange Facts and Amazing Articles
A34: Social Psychology - The Individual
COROLLARY THEOREMS: Mathematics is built on two basic operations only
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 All people like to "see things". Take an Afghan person, a USA
citizen, a French, a German, a Nigerian, a Chinese, a ... well, anyone: they all like to travel and "see new
things" more than anything else. We could say our Homo Sapiens is more like "Homo Traveler".
Psychologically, that is a very interesting, general, common-behavior aspect; therefore, the question is:
"Why?"I was fourteen or, possibly, fifteen when I had a contradictory argument with Captain Giga. At one moment he got very angry and said I should better keep my mouth shut, because he had seen the entire world. I replied that "seeing the world" means nothing if someone doesn't have "the eyes" to see it. Of course, my remark freed a torrent of invectives, then Captain Giga ended asking, what I meant by "not having the eyes to see the world"; was it my intention to insult him by insinuating that he was blind? I explained that the world, or Life, may be "seen" ONLY with the "eyes of the mind": if you have those eyes, then you can "see" a little something; if not, physically seeing anything is not going to help anybody. Those words of mine have enlarged and deepened the rift between Captain Giga and me to an irreversible ... Well. Human individuals have a specific mode of psychological development--particularly interesting. First, children are born into our world, and each has the brain completely clean, psychologically, except for few basic instincts. Whatever a child learns, and the mature individual he is going to be one day, that is the result of a very complex set of social efforts named "education". For each nation--better said for the entire species--each new born child represents the future, our hopes, and the great world of tomorrow; in other worlds, each child is the most precious "value" our civilization has. Mountains of gold, oceans of oil, trillions of dollars, endless lands or many atomic weapons, mean absolutely nothing compared to a child. [Note that we used the indefinite article "a" deliberately ahead of the noun "child"]. Of course, there is one in a billion chance--or even less--that a child will become "someone truly great", but that doesn't matter a bit: any child could be "The One". When a child is born it has all basic instincts: milk sucking; mother recognition based on smell at first, then on sight; hiding; and learning. All mammal babies are capable of learning, though for Homo Sapiens, today, learning takes about 35 years--in normal conditions. During the first three or four years children are able to learn any language, regardless of how complex it is; for example, the English one. That is a stunning performance! A mature, East European nuclear physicist is not able to match that skill not even after 10 years of intense efforts! Further--and in normal conditions--up to the age of 25 children go through the official education system: the school. That is the most important learning period, in which children learn--psychologically--to be HUMAN and SOCIAL individuals. However, that is also where society fails catastrophically. Next, up to the age of 35 each individual fights his way up in society, and that means more learning efforts. Between the age of 35 and 45 the individuals struggle very hard trying to "accommodate psychologically" in society. The great 45 years limit is--generally--the time when some individuals begin to understand "society", and they know what they have to do. Psychologically, 45 is the true "social maturity" age for us, today. How people continue to evolve psychically after 45 is very important: for most comes the decline; for very few, however, they become the theoreticians of our civilization! Psychical maturity is the apex, and a limit: once reached then, that's it: there is no more psychological/mental development. People still learn, but they do not understand and they do not believe anymore, because they "know"! The scenario outlined in the paragraph above represents "normal development" but "normal" is the ideal for us. In real life, things are far from being even close to normal; for example, psychological maturity may come even at the age of 7, for some. Each adult person was a nice, little child once. However, in most instances children are strange, and difficult to understand for their parents. Why? The general idea is, life is changing, and different generations do not understand each other--which is entirely wrong. No matter how much is the fashion-culture changing, human nature, or human psychology remains the same. The idea that children are "different" is just an excuse for incompetence. Two thousand years old documents reveal that parents at that time also had problems understanding their children. For thousand years the fashion has changed with each new generation, and each change appeared to be more vulgar, provocative, and of "bad taste". However, what children and parents alike do not know is that cultural fashion is--and it was--controlled by mature, smart individuals, having precise goals. Further, if your child "follows" the fashion trend "to the letter" that is a clear indication the child has some psychological limitations--unfortunately, most of them do, but that represents natural distribution of intelligence in society. Any cultural fashion is good only if it brings some benefits to the people; many times cultural fashion does, but there are instances when it doesn't. For example, mutilating the body with all sort of "piercing" or tattoos cannot bring anything better to natural beauty. However, that is a clear indication the subject has very little intellectual capacity, and it works like an indicator: the more piercing/tattooing, the less intelligent is the subject. Intelligent children sense they are different, and they avoid becoming "one of the herd" or "like everybody else". Society is characterized, first of all, by the "average", and that "average" represents in fact a very low intelligence level. Most individuals (children or adults) follow the fashion-trend like the "rest of the herd"; sometimes, however, few decide to be different. Anyway, to make this short, human psychology needs to be studied as: 1. individual 2. social  What we care most, as people living in society, is that all individuals have good, strong social instincts, or social morality. However, some people become our leaders, and in those instances individual psychology is far more important. For example, we are very fortunate Mr. George Walker Bush is the USA President today, and not 40 or 30 years ago, because he has a "trigger happy" complexity. If he had been the USA President 40 years ago, the Third (Nuclear) World War was our reality today, and we would have been all dead or nonexistent. Not that it is Mr. Bush's fault: that is the way he is, and that's it. Should he be offered the chance to live his life 100 times, again and again, Mr. Bush would do exactly what he does today, because he is certain he does the best things possible as the USA President. Mind this please: Mr. Bush does only what he thinks is best for USA and for the world! Even more, no matter of the arguments, Mr. Bush will never understand that "there are better alternatives"--attention please: this "never" refers to the ETERNITY! As individual, Mr. Bush is a very nice person--even charming--and he truly believes he is an ordinary USA citizen just like anybody else: what is good for him, it has to be good for USA also. Even more, Mr. Bush is a strong, honest believer and supporter of democracy--of course, that is "his democracy". Personally, we like Mr. Bush a lot, and we write about him only because he is a well known personality in the entire world; should we present here the honorable Prime Minister of Canada, nobody would care a bit--well, almost nobody. So, there is nothing wrong with Mr. Bush: that's just the way he is. The truly sad thing is the USA voters: the most recent polls indicate they do not support Mr. Bush's leadership lately. This is similar to a marriage: two individuals like each other a lot and they rush to get married; few years later, they discover they made a big mistake, but breaking that "marriage" is (almost) impossible. Who is to blame? Not Mr. Bush for certain. You see, Mr. Bush will end his leadership one day, and the USA voters will be asked to elect someone else. If they will continue electing nice people as is Mr. Bush, then it may be there will be no more USA in the future, and nothing else left of our little, beautiful planet. Social psychology is extremely important for the health of any civilized society, therefore countless armies of psychology doctors are needed. However, the great question is: "What do those hundreds of thousands of psychology doctors actually do, because 'social things' go from bad to worse, continuously?" Civilized societies rely on three social organizations for health and protection: 1. the police: this "force" works for society just as doctors work for individuals. The police force is needed to clean and sanitize our society of bad individuals, because one single rotten apple in a basket is capable of destroying all other apples--try this if you don't believe it; 2. the government: this social organism ensures the proper management and prosperous development of any society--in theory, at least; 3. the psychologists: they are needed more and more, due to technological development. The more advanced a society becomes, the stronger is the need for good psychological advice to "regulate" complex social problems. All three social-organisms above will not function correctly if there are no means to control and punish bad behavior at any level, including the Presidential one. However, who could punish the USA President, for example? Nobody! Take the case of Mr. William Jefferson Clinton and his congressional impeachment attempt: it proved totally inefficient due to political maneuvers. However, the need to control anybody, including the USA President, needs to be there. Now, the only way to control any level of power in any society is MORALITY; better said, INDIVIDUAL MORALITY. Should Mr. Clinton had any trace of morality in his character, he would have resigned "his good job" after the "Monica affair". However, Mr. Clinton is not the only one hanging with claws and teeth on a tarnished "job". [Mr. Richard Milhous Nixon is an example of "towering morality" compared to Mr. Clinton, despite all his "weaknesses".] More and more managers and CEOs refuse shamelessly to resign, and they hang on the job as for dear life: this is more like a "fashion", or a "doctrine" today. Democracy has no means to deal efficiently with imposture, corruption, nepotism, mismanagement, theft or even worse, at very high decisional levels. Only MORALITY could help us. However, MORALITY is degrading steadily, despite the fact we have armies of psychologists: their first and THE ONLY DUTY is to protect social-morality, since it is the only viable instrument of correction at any level.  Our life appears to be a chaotic amalgam of events, chances, misfortune, accidents. Should we know how to use it, psychology could become a precise, social-mathematical instrument to help us "see" true reality of today, and of tomorrow. *** First published on October 01, 2006 |
||
| LINKS
TO OTHER PAGES 1. LEARN HARDWARE FIRMWARE AND SOFTWARE DESIGN - the easy way! 2. LOGICALLY STRUCTURED ENGLISH GRAMMAR - a must have. | ||
Back to AMAZING ARTICLES Main Page | ||
 | ||
|
||
| Send your
comments regarding this page using support@corollarytheorems.com Page last updated on: October 27, 2007 © Corollary Theorems Ltd. All rights reserved. |
||
|
||
|
||
