A group of USA political scientists have reached the common conclusion that
Democracy is
not good (not working) for poor people. Of course it doesn't, if they consider "Democracy" the existing
political form of government in USA: THAT is NOT Democracy, gentlemen!
In a TRUE Democracy, poor people are the MOST FAVORED, since they form, in fact, the great majority.
[Fragment from "Global Picture in News" October 19,
2006. © Corollary Theorems Ltd.]
*

Everybody knows the level of the available public knowledge/information on our
planet is "structured" on
a need-to-know basis. That means, the lowest level of pertinent information is the "general
public" one--let's name it level zero, just to have a reference. That level zero is "fed" with
information coming from "official sources", which is, in most
instances, not only far from the truth, but
even in opposition to the actual facts. That process is named propaganda
and it has many reasons/causes behind; the most important one is, the
politicians/oligarchs want their people/employees to mind their usual tasks--work--in a relaxed
manner, and without worries.
At a first look their reason appears to be innocent, and we cannot blame them too much for that. In a deeper
analysis, however, things are a lot "darker", on one hand; on the other, people do have the right to
know everything. We believe the public is able to handle ANY type of information without panicking or even
worrying too much. The last terrorist attack on the London Subway is the best example: people know there could be
be other bomb attacks, but they still use the Subs, and they say, if it is going to happen again, then that's it.
This is the new reality for us: we, the victims, are facing this situation with the same attitude the suicide
bombers do--we all have to die sooner or later. We are certain most people believe each of us has a destiny to
accomplish, and we have to fulfill it no matter what. Given that attitude of the general public, hiding or
distorting the truth becomes an almost illegal act. We, at least, are not going to commit illegalities.
In our last article we said we should start developing the Plasma Jet, Ionic Jet, and the Antigravity engines, but
the truth is, that research already started in the '60s--maybe even earlier,
but that is the timeline we know. At
this time, it is possible all three types of engines are already working.
As a general idea, the chemical reaction engine we use today is powerful enough to propel a rocket up to 40
Km/sec. An Ionic Jet engine could reach 300 or 400 Km/sec. The Plasma Jet engine should
work anywhere in between. Both the Plasma and Ionic Jets can be easily--this is relatively easy--implemented with the
available, existing technologies. Now, because there is no new data about these two engines, it is clear to us they
are already working.
The Antigravity engine is again within our reach, technologically, and we suspect it is also working--at least in
a prototype phase. Of course, as mentioned previously, in order to reach the stars we need a lot more advanced
engines than the Antigravity or Ionic Jet ones. In addition, we need to make the shift form our actual Quantum
Mechanics Theory, to the Subatomic Theory we try to profile in these pages, and in our SF books--that change
will come, in due time.
More important today is, we are facing a terrible energy crisis, and we should take preventive measures right
now. There are many practical alternatives to replace oil as our main source
of energy. Three of them are worth
mentioning; therefore, we will explain them briefly, one at a time.
The most important source of energy is hydrogen. First of all, it is the least pollutant and, secondly, this will
encourage the study of the hydrogen atom because it still hides many unknown "powers" to us. In order
to produce hydrogen there are few practical options, as follows. We can produce hydrogen using water electrolysis
and energy from unconventional power sources, such as the solar one, the wind, and
the tide energy. With little
efforts and investments today, most countries could become tomorrow producers of hydrogen, just like today's oil
exporters. Those countries having great exposure to sun, the desert ones--the poorest countries today--have a net
advantage. Unconventional electrical power is particularly suited for producing hydrogen, because we do not need
constant DC voltage and current for that.
Another method of producing hydrogen is by blowing a stream of water vapors over red hot iron or carbon having
temperatures around 700 Celsius degrees. Many accidents happened in the metallurgical industry when hot metal was
cooled in water. People didn't know why terrible explosions happened, from time to time.
This is the explanation:
red hot metal or carbon are both capable to extract the oxygen from water,
therefore hydrogen is released. Now, if that
process is carefully designed, it could become sufficiently beneficial. As a note here, using water to put out very
strong fires is feeding, in fact, the fire with flammable hydrogen. People know this chemical reaction but ... Well!
We could isolate the oxygen directly from water using chemical reactions, and new, better catalysts--some
more research
is needed to improve these technologies. Another good method to produce hydrogen is to use algae or bacteria, and
there are many technologies already developed. Lastly, we could use osmosis to produce hydrogen. As mentioned, the
result could be that all countries in the World will become self sufficient
energetically by producing their own
hydrogen. In addition, producing hydrogen during "low consumption hours" will help flattening
the "charge curve" of all power stations, which means maximum efficiency.
The second source of energy is ethanol produced from corn or vegetable mass. That means increased
agricultural activity, which is not that bad. The truth is, we need to take immediate control of our planet
reforestation, because there are way too many surfaces looking like desert. Reforestation, and organized
exploitation of the vegetal resources will recuperate much of the unused land surface today, and that should be
sufficient to satisfy a good part of our energetic hunger. Besides, reforestation of the planet could bring to all
of us lots of benefits, among which an increased production of oxygen is the most important. We could easily
triple the forest areas in 20 years if each country in the World works on this global, capital project, starting
now. Our opinion is, we have to do that regardless of the energetic crisis.
We made a mistake when we wrote this article, because we
failed to consider human stupidity "at-work". We said, "The second source of energy is ethanol produced from corn or vegetable mass
..."
We couldn't imagine someone would use edible corn, and agricultural
surfaces dedicated to human consumption to produce fuels, but that
is exactly what happened in Canada, USA, UK, and many other countries.
Besides, we have presented just an EXAMPLE, not the best methods of
producing ethanol.
For the eyes of stupid government people only, the most efficient
way of producing ethanol is from fruits, or plants rich in sugar.
However, that does not mean you have to steal babies' candies to produce
your miserable fuels. Also, fruit trees may be planted in addition to
the existing farm-land, not on first-hand soils. The priority is
people's welfare, not to overfill your bottomless pockets. |
The third option for a better energy source is methane using again algae and methane producing bacteria. All these
technologies are already available, and they can be easily improved. The only thing missing is little social will.
Unfortunately, there is a bunch of people having great interests in the oil industry--that is, great cash
benefits--and they are opposing to any action intended to curb down the consumption of oil, and to implement
better, cleaner, cheaper, and more available alternatives. That bunch of deep-pockets individuals rule the entire
World, and they do whatever they want. That's the way things are, and there is not much we can do because their means of control
are based on Democracy!
Democracy is very slow to implement changes; besides, in times of crises,
Democracy is totally inefficient. Amazingly,
with a minimum level of intelligence and some
power--money--a minority group can easily control any
Democratic society. You do not have to take our words for that; in fact, we urge you not to do it. Just look
around you very, very careful.
***
First published on July 22, 2005
© Corollary Theorems Ltd. All rights reserved.
|