A19: Propulsion - PlasmaJet, IonicJet, and the Antigravity Engines

*

Natural antigravity was first described in THREE STORIES FROM HILSA'N TASSA GALAXY, PEASANT AMBASSADOR story. It says there the antigravity vector exists naturally in all atoms; however, we cannot "see" its manifestations, because the gravity component is greater. The new question is: "How is it possible the gravity vector is greater than the antigravity one?" We are used to see forces and reactions to those forces that balance each other; how could a force and its reaction be imbalanced?

We mentioned few times by now the "Universal Imbalance Principle", and time has come to explain it--better said, a small part. Now, we have few physical laws, among which the "Energy Conservation Law" is the most important. This law says:

Energy is not created; energy is not consumed; energy changes, only, from one form to another.

As you can see, all physical laws, principles, and theorems start from a statement, or a set of statements as the one above. Mathematical implementation of those statements comes later, and it may take many forms. Anyway, the point to note is, the Energy Conservation Law is one of the most important one in Physics, if not THE most important. Hundreds and thousands of corollary theorems have been postulated, based on this law--for example, consider Kirchhoff's equations for electrical nets: they were written according to the Energy Conservation Law.

The point to note is, this mighty Law brings a perplexing observation: before the Big-Bang Time Zero there was NOTHING. Next, the Big-Bang comes, and that pops-up a terrible amount of energy into the Atomic Universe. In fact it looks like that energy it is still being injected today in this side--please read our previous articles. It appears the Energy Conservation Law doesn't work in this Big Bag spectacular instance which is also THE most important one. Fact is the Law works just fine. All energies existing in our Atomic Universe come from Subatomic, from Primary Energies--details are presented in THREE STORIES FROM HILSA'N TASSA GALAXY and in MERCY.

However, we cannot measure, or detect those Primary Energies, and many doubt they actually exist. They HAVE TO EXIST otherwise the great Energy Conservation Law it is not right, and 99% of our Physics is totally wrong. The point to note is, those Primary Energies ARE NOT energies as we know them; they are SOMETHING capable of GENERATING energies in our Atomic Universe. In the Subatomic, Primary Energies are not capable to react with each other. In fact, physical laws are different there, and we will take a look at that issue later. Now, if we do not take the Primary Energies into consideration, then our entire Atomic Universe makes no sense.

The Universal Imbalance Principle, says:

There is a flow of [energy] from the Subatomic Universe into the Atomic one, due to ...

We didn't finish the above statement, because we do not intend to discuss the causes of that unidirectional flow of energy--this deals with the Certitude Factors and with the Fundamental Reasons, but these notions are so fantastic at this time, that it would be totally futile to attempt explaining them. We will do it gradually, starting in our SF books.

That imbalance is extremely important, because if it would cease now, then the entire Atomic Universe would disappear instantly. Even more, the imbalance is needed to form the matter in the Atomic Universe. Our Atomic Universe is now 90% Hydrogen atoms, but it was 100% monoatomic hydrogen atoms shortly after the Big-Bang. All hydrogen atoms miss exactly one electron, in order to complete their "s" electronic orbital, and that means our Atomic Universe is positively charged, chemically and electrically. Now, the true beauty is, that perplexing extra positive charge of the monoatomic hydrogen atom DOES NOT COME from the proton!

The question is: "Is that electrical imbalance of our Atomic Universe a good thing or a bad one?" Not only it is a good thing, but it is also a necessary one. This time, the CREATOR--or Mother Nature--gives us another example of PERFECTION BASED ON IMPERFECTION. If the hydrogen atom had a complete "s" electronic orbital, then hydrogen would have been an inert atom, a noble one, and it wouldn't reacted with other elements. There would be no higher, active, atomic mass elements--better said, there could be higher atomic mass elements but almost all of them would also be inert, chemically. That clearly exemplifies the fact our Atomic Universe was built for maximum, optimum performance. 

As it is mentioned in our SF books, the antigravity vector exists in all atoms and it is equal to the gravity one. However, antigravity is much consumed inside the atom, while gravity is needed to structure matter at the outside-atom and macro-cosmos levels. Now, the antigravity vector may be amplified, and there are many practical ways of doing that.

The difficult thing with these articles is, we try to change the existing "mechanical" mentality using notions that are too difficult to understand, because they do not exist--except in our SF books and in these articles. The good news is, we do not have to listen to absurd arguments, therefore we are able to continue with our articles unobstructed. In time, after many SF books and articles, some people will start "believing", and that is going to be a very good starting point.

Anyway, someone  mentioned to us that we do not have engines strong enough to replace Discovery Shuttle's (reactive) reusable boosters. That is perfectly true, but it is just because we didn't try hard enough to research for a better engine than the chemical reactive one. The efforts should be focused towards implementing the "antigravity engine". That is going to take some time, about 25 .. 50 .. 100 years, but the idea is, we need to start sooner than later--in fact, the best time is right now. It is just a matter of planning and good organization; therefore, we will summarize here a rough scenario. First, although the final purpose is the antigravity engine, the research activity needs to be developed in parallel with other practical applications; for example, the first engine to be developed should be the "plasma jet" one.

"How?" will ask most of the readers. You see, up to now we have developed simple applications based on a single principle, say reaction, or internal combustion. Time has come to consider a "chain" of engines, or physical effects, in order to obtain increased performances. The "hybrid" vehicle is an excellent example. In the plasma jet case, we should start with a plasma generator, then with an electrical generator, and then with an ionic reactor. The working fluid used should be water; better said monatomic hydrogen and oxygen. That is the least polluting option, and it also has a lot of internal energy: it is only up to us to use the most of it. That plasma jet engine needs to be further developed and optimized into the more performing "ionic jet" engine--again, while working in parallel on the antigravity engine.

***

First published on July 20, 2005 
© Corollary Theorems Ltd. All rights reserved.