The Latins used to say, "tempus fugit", meaning, "time passes very
fast". The implicit meaning associated is, "time is the only thing we cannot afford to waste" or
"time is the most precious thing in our lives".
There are many proverbs in our Civilization, and most of them are valuable for their implicit meanings, not for
their "word by word" translation. For example, "there is never too late", it does not mean
that we have plenty of time for everything; on the contrary, time is the most precious thing in our lives.
"There is never too late," refers to, "There is never too late to repair a mistake IF YOU ARE ABLE
TO SEE IT. In most instances however ..."
[Fragment from "Global Picture in News" December 17,
2006. © Corollary Theorems Ltd.]
*
 The city-state Athens has introduced, 2500 years ago, the first
political form of Democracy in our Civilization. What is amazing, 2500 years later we are not able to think of a
better political form of government than that old Athenian Democracy! Well, it may be those Latin philosophers were
particularly intelligent--this is, way more intelligent than we are today. Some
may say: "They had
better school training ..." Makes sense. Anyway, the question is: "Is it possible to have a
better form of government than Democracy?" Of course it is.
The old Hellenic Democracy had a relatively short existence, though it was copied by the Romans during their
Republic period. Amazingly, the Romans managed to work with their Democracy for about 400 years, then it went
away, and then it was rediscovered during our "modern era"--this is during the last 250 years. Will
Democracy--as it is today and we name it "modern"--will manage to last for more than, say, 300 years?
Frankly, we doubt that very much. It was Gaius Julius Caesar who ended Roman
Democracy by proclaiming himself
Dictator, but the interesting aspect is, the ordinary Roman citizens were very happy at that time to end their
democratic period once and forever! Particular to Roman Democracy was, corruption, injustice, and immorality had
reached unbelievable levels. Sounds familiar, aye?
We have absolutely nothing against Democracy; in fact, we like it very much. The problem is, we looked carefully
at our historical lessons, and we noticed that Democracy cannot live for too long
since it ends up in
auto-destruction. Today, the most advanced form of political Democracy on
our planet is the
European Union. We admire its
principles, and we can only hope it will prove to be a successful, viable, political structure, although the
democratic dangers are still there. Those democratic dangers are:
1. corruption
2. imposture (plus nepotism)
3. the "democratic mechanism of selection"
4. political, economical, and juridical immobility
5. immorality
[Read MERCY for details.]
We said we admire Democracy, and that was not an emphatic literary
expression. Fact is, some of the brightest minds of our
Civilization have flourished during democratic periods of government. Therefore, some of the most advanced ideas and
principles have also been defined during democratic regimes. Take the notion of
atom invented by the
old Greek philosophers: 2500 years later we do know a lot more about the atom, but we are not able to think
further than the Greek philosophers did--to think of what is beyond atom, for example.
Consider the Dialectic Method of Logic Investigation (2500 years old): we have no better method today,
but what is truly alarming is, most people have absolutely no idea what Dialectics is! In fact, not only we do not
have better philosophical methods today, but we use philosophy in a degenerate mode. Philosophy comes form the
Latin "Philos" and "Sophia" which mean together exactly "many sciences". Philosophy is truly
the science of all sciences, and it MUST include the main ones: Mathematics, Physics, Biology, Astronomy and, of
course, History. The way we use it today, Philosophy is just a set of literary and propagandistic slogans--well,
more or less. We could present hundreds similar examples of incredible, advanced Hellenic Civilization
concepts but ... who cares? To us, it is perfectly clear those Latin gentlemen and their schools were way more
advanced, intellectually, than anything we have today.
Anyway, we intend to discuss about mental powers in this article. Now, in addition to having a certain degree of
intelligence--of course, some have more, many have less--human beings have mental powers. That is the way we were
created by the GREAT CREATOR, and that is HIS WILL. Again, some people have stronger mental powers, while many
have them insignificant, or dormant. However, the interesting point to note is,
we all have some mental
powers hidden, somewhere deep inside us.
Unfortunately, living our life is not easy: it is not easy today, it was not easy yesterday, and it is going to be
very difficult tomorrow, for a while. Because we live in such stressing
social environments, we do not have the time
needed to investigate our mental powers: we have to fight for our daily survival. However, few people among us did
manage to "wake up" some of their mental powers, and we do have many proofs
of that. Consider for
example Mr. Michel de Notredame (Nostradamus). Sure, there were, and they still are, very many other people having
mental powers, though they have no idea of what is happening: they think they were "gifted" in a
particular way by the GREAT CREATOR.
Many are aware there are people among us having great mental powers, but very few know that the truly
powerful ones prefer to hide themselves. Their reasons for hiding are multiple and various, and we
simply cannot account for all of them. More important to us are the nature, the ways to
tame/educate, and the methods to amplify/train those mental powers.
Again, let's consider the famous, incredible, though also well-known case of Mr. de Notredame. We know he used some sort of a rudimentary apparatus
to facilitate his
vision sessions, but that explains exactly nothing. What we want to point
out is, think that you are Mr. de Notredame, and imagine you can "see" the future as in a nice panoramic movie--of course, with no
words, or with words totally unfamiliar to you. Our conclusion is, seeing a picture or a movie about the future
cannot help anybody understand anything, because no picture or movie can establish a precise moment in time over
the centuries, the names of historical people, undiscovered or inexistent geographical/political
places/countries, and the true, global, existing political
situation. Mr. de Notredame did a lot more than simply seeing the future; in fact,
HE KNEW IT! The new question is,
how did he do that?
The secrets of seeing the future, and of many other types of mental powers, are revealed in
LATANCONCOP--not
published yet. When we say "revealed" we mean it--this is not a philosophical speculation or some sort of
literary fantasy thing. We do not like fantasy; we like science, only. Now, this mental powers topic is an
extraordinary one, and also very complex. Mental powers are explained in
MERCY (the basics are defined there), and they
continue in LATANCONCOP and in the coming books.
Scientifically, mental powers are needed to help us investigate the Subatomic and the
Certitude Factors. Of
course, we do need to design a mathematical model of the Subatomic, and another one for the Certitude Factors, but
do not forget that mathematical models are, and they will forever be, limited and imperfect. Psychokinetic
experimentations may help us detect and explore the nature of the Subatomic. In fact, today, scientific mental
tests are performed intensively, under the strictest secret possible by many governments. The
only problem they have is, without
knowing what to look for ...
If you want to read more about mental powers we suggest
THREE STORIES FROM HILSA'N TASSA GALAXY and
MERCY. Now, it could happen
the mental powers topic may seem fantastic, "fiction something" to you; think that everything in our life is
only science in the most pure format. The Creation of the Real Universe by our CREATOR is science as we cannot even
imagine: it is a fantastic, Science Fiction-like science.
***
First published on June 06, 2005
© Corollary Theorems Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
