" ... because we all know English grammar is of German origin ..."
The above words were written few days ago by some N. American writer somewhere on the Internet. The exact place
where the incident happened is not important; what is important is that many (or all) "know that"! The
truth is, yes, you could say English grammar is of German origin, providing you consider that German itself has
about 70% of its grammar structure founded on vigorous Latin-roots. For clarification on the topic, and on very
many others, we suggest Logically Structured English Grammar.
This is an unexplainable situation. Our Civilization had such an extraordinarily advanced culture, the Hellenic
(Latin) one, yet very many people today do not like that-- particularly in the English countries. The Germans were
just hordes of primitive creatures (same as the French, the Helvets, the Belgs, the Scandinavians, the Huns, and
all others) when they came into Europe. We are extremely fortunate there was a Roman Empire during those days to
spread the Latin culture, otherwise we would continue selling/killing slaves and raiding territories through
"fire and sword" today. This is a very interesting social-psychology aspect, therefore it is going to be
dissected thoroughly in one of our future Articles.
The lack of basic, general culture these days is stunning! For example, Hitler--the most ardent supporter of the
"German race superiority"--was very proud, and greatly impressed with the Latin roots the German people
had from Roman Empire. His famous salute "from heart to sky" was copied from Roman Imperial Guards
salute: "Heil Hitler" is identical to "Ave Caesar" in meanings and in gestures. Hitler's
hottest dream was to build a one thousand years German Empire, just like the Roman one--read our Article 38.
Anyway, one hundred years ago people knew a lot more about the unmatched greatness of the Roman Empire than they
do today. Our Modern societies having specific social-relations, laws, governmental structures, Democracy,
science, literature, entertainment, and ... whatever, are all tailored according to the Roman model (and
implicitly the Hellenic one). Modern Education, you say? Well!
[Fragment from "Global Picture in News" December 1,
2006. © Corollary Theorems Ltd.]
*
Our Atomic Universe is built, naturally and obviously, out of atomic elements. Most of the time
atomic elements group themselves into complex substances: "molecules". We have named 118 atomic elements
up to now--or something--but there is place left for many more elements in the "Periodic Table of
Elements". [The names "element" and "atom" mean exactly the same thing in certain
contexts.] In the same time we know and work with about two hundred thousands complex substances--this is just a
rough approximation. [The names "substance" and "molecule" mean exactly the same thing in
certain contexts.]
We say, we know and work with atomic elements and molecules, but things are far from being clear to us, regarding
what they really are. For example, many scientists know that billions of dollars have been spent on water
molecule research during the last 50 years, allover the world. Despite little gains in knowledge about what
water really is, it appears that lately both the funding and the research efforts have increased a lot! So, after
50 years of intense research we do not know too much about the pure, simple H2O (hydro). Well, the
plain truth is, the simple and fundamental water molecule is a true mystery for our science. Now, if you add to
that mystery what is suggested in Peasant Ambassador, then the little water molecule is going to lead us straight
to antigravity!
Sure, the water molecule is a substance built out of two elements, therefore it could be too complex for our
gentle, sweet mechanical science. Let's look at only one atomic element, for example the very first and the most
simple one: hydrogen. Many researchers are very proud to proclaim they have solved the Schrodinger equation for
the hydrogen atom. However, the solved equation helps nobody, and nothing. The Scrodinger equation is part of the
Quantum Mechanics Mathematical Model of the hydrogen atom, and solving it is just another mathematical exercise.
That equation tells exactly nothing about the real hydrogen atom.
It was mentioned in A7 that we do need mathematical models, and on certain atomic/subatomic levels we do not have
better instruments to continue our research. That is perfectly true, but we have to clarify the concept a little.
All mathematical models are just "theoretical models"; they are not the "real thing". This
affirmation is valid today, tomorrow, one thousand years from this time, and even one million years from now on.
The atomic mathematical models we use today, say, the Quantum Mechanics Theory, are developed more like a
collection of mathematical exercises which are excellent for mathematicians, but they have little or nothing to do
with the reality under study: the atom. The Quantum Mechanics Theory (QMT) is a bunch of equations which are
solved based on few assumptions: for example, "c", the speed of light, is the maximum possible speed in
the Universe. In fact QMT is such preposterously absurd that our Universe--and us--shouldn't exist, according to
its "equations"!
Because very few people know how vague and utopian QMT is, huge amounts of money are pumped into building enormous
installations for breaking and fusing the atoms. With little efforts, the atom may be broken "free of
charge" using the microwave stove in the kitchen. Those monstrous particle accelerators are used, mainly, to
measure the energies of the atomic particles--well, let's take a look at those energies a little, this time
without a multi-billion dollars particles-accelerator: we are going to use only our brains!
In the interstellar space the temperature is very low: about 1 .. 3 Kelvin degrees, and that is as far as we can
reach in nature, towards 0 Kelvin degree. Imagine that one oxygen atom is part of a molecule [SiO2 for
example] inside a rock, somewhere in open space. Because it is so cold, there is no energy coming into the oxygen
atom to sustain the movement of its electrons--eight--around the nucleus. Any book of physics will tell you that
at very low temperatures the atom "keeps a small quantity of energy" which allows the electrons to
continue spinning around the nucleus. That sounds reasonable, but only for the untrained mind. Now, try to imagine
that our piece of rock is lost in open space for 6 billion years--this is reality. Next, try to calculate how much
energy the electrons of one oxygen atom consume during that enormous period of time--it should be way more than 1
KW per oxygen atom. Of course, a decent piece of rock has about one billion oxygen atoms, and that means our
little piece of rock the size of a pebble "consumes" 1 Terra Watt of power from nowhere! At the scale of
the entire matter existing in open space in the Universe the numbers defy any imagination, regardless of how wild
it could be. The problem is, where is that enormous amount of energy coming from? The Quantum Mechanics Theory is
dead silent about that, but ... You should read MERCY, dear people.
In the book following MERCY, LATANCONCOP, you will read about the structure of the electron, among many other
interesting topics. We are certain you cannot believe this, but our tiny electron named "particle" in
QMT is not a particle at all. In fact, the little electron hides so many secrets that we will not be able to
discover them all not even after 10000 years of continuous, ascending development. As for the true nature and the
structure of the protons, neutrons, and ... Ah, well!
 The Cold Fusion experiments using the "Ball Lightning" state of matter--which we arbitrarily
have named the "electronic cloud"--show the electrons can do a lot more than just holding an electrical
charge. Amazingly, at atom level the electrons act like a shield which prevents the photons to reach the nucleus.
That is an interesting observation, and it is similar to the "plasma and laser shield" described in
MERCY, Hurran Invasion, and Peasant Ambassador.
Well, we could go on and on, but we do not want to spoil your surprise when reading our books. Now, let's direct
our attention towards the psychological aspects of the scientific research activity--you could find more details
about this in MERCY. Things are this way: most of the scientists today behave similar to religious fanatics. That
is, they "trust" and "believe" in their "books", and they do not want to hear any
heresies. Now, you shouldn't worry too much about that absurd, irrational manifestation, because that is, in fact,
natural human behavior. However, we intend to discuss the subject sometime, because it is very important.
You see, we could stuff these Internet pages with new, incredible theories and strange phenomena about the atom
and beyond, but this will help exactly nothing and nobody. No matter how advanced technologically we will become
one day, for us, the Homo Sapiens species, the only thing important is to develop true, good human qualities:
honesty, respect, love, trust ... The truth is, too advanced technologies can easily lead us to total destruction,
given our existing social-psychology level of development.
Any scientist, or future scientist, MUST BE first of all a compassionate and sympathetic person; in other words,
an intellectual. That is far more important than understanding the Certitude Factors and the Fundamental Imbalance
Principle that drives the Subatomic, for example. In fact, becoming intelligent people with true, good, human
feelings is the great goal of our entire species. If we manage to reach our goal, then we will be equal to any
civilization, anywhere, regardless of our--or their--technological level.
***
First published on May 27, 2005
© Corollary Theorems Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
