|
 Each government on our planet today is desperate to get/grab
anything that belongs to the
"unexplained", to UFOs, or to any historical technology secrets.
Fact is,
"desperate" is not the right word; they are capable of ANYTHING to get
their hands on those artifacts, secrets,
whatever. The idea is, each country/nation strives to achieve "technological supremacy" and
the "absolute power". Now, from the social-psychology point of view, that
behavior is common and natural. Still, the troublesome aspect is the official propaganda:
there
are no unexplained things, there are no UFOs, and historical secrets do not exist; everything is
just ordinary and normal.
Well, that "natural" social mentality is due to a state of very low real average social intelligence
that
exists today in our human society, everywhere. It is possible in about 100 years from this time one country on our
planet will achieve that "technological supremacy", therefore it will enslave all other nations.
When that moment will become a reality, people are going to discover that
technological power is not sufficient; better said, technological power
is far from anything. If you have little patience, you may discover what
is way, way more powerful and important than technology is, in these
Amazing Articles of our SF books.
As a note, we do not try to sell anything to anyone. If you want to
learn, that is just fine with us, and we can help you; if you like to
just "play"
in your life, then our
advice to you is, do it as hard as you can, forever!
*
It is not easy to decide on the most interesting topic for a first article. Anyway, after many
painful sacrifices, we have settled for the birth of our Universe: the great Big Bang itself! The Big-Bang theory
started spreading among the scientists at the beginning of the twentieth century,
after the English translation of
the Sanskrit Veda poems was published in 1899.
|
The "Big Bang" theory says: the Universe has a cyclic evolution. It starts with a
single, invisible point--named "a singularity", by most scientists--which contains the entire mass of the
Universe, including space and time. Next, the little invisible point explodes
in a "Big Bang", then
matter, space, and time appear as we know them. Of course, matter appears as basic atomic particles/components at
first, and they need to group themselves together to form atoms, molecules, stars, planetary systems, and in the
end the Galaxies. The Universe continues to expand for billions of years, then it
should stop its motion; next, it
should begin collapsing. The collapsing of our Universe continues until a new singularity point is formed, and a new
cycle is "bound" to start again.
The Big Bang theory was explained the first time after the Indian Veda poems were translated and
published in 1899. Please note this: that (exceptional) translation was performed
(at that time) according to our mechanical
capacity of
understanding the Universe. In other words, we understand the science of the Universe only if it is explained
"mechanically". This is our actual level of Civilization: mechanical! In reality, things are far from
being mechanical in nature, and we have no doubt this aspect is perfectly well documented in the original Veda poems.
However, the problem is, we cannot understand what is not
mechanical in nature. We are certain that the first translators have added
a little "mechanical
touch" to the entire picture, in order to make some sense out of
those incredibly advanced ideas.
Note that the Big-Bang theory does not hold water, and many scientists know it very well. Today, when a new
star is born, there is no Bang at all. Fact is, the wave sounds do not travel through vacuum--they cannot do it.
Therefore, why should it be such a Big Bang the very first time when there was actually no space/vacuum at all?
Now, if it was a Big Bang or not, this is totally not important. However, this absurd naming
used reflects perfectly clear
our actual capacity of understanding reality. A "Big Bang" suggests a
mechanical explosion, and this "mechanical picture" makes
perfect sense to most of us. |
|
|
Most of the scientists today agree today with the Big Bang theory. Even more, famous ancient texts, as are
Ramayana and Mahabharata,
prove that our ancestors, fine Ladies and Gentlemen, were well familiar with the Big Bang theory
7000 .. 10000 years ago! Now, the real beauty about this Big Bang theory is, it is not quite clear regarding particular
aspects, and that is very good news, because it leaves plenty of room for further investigations.
One thing is certain: there was one initial moment in time when our Universe appeared (that is the Big Bang
moment), and we named it, Time Zero. Before Time Zero, some scientists consider there was NOTHING, meaning, no
matter, no space, and no time. Other scientists say, the entire mass of the Universe was concentrated in a
single, invisible point named--poetically only, without any scientific fundament--a singularity.
To us, the
NOTHING hypothesis makes far more sense.
Further form Time Zero, there is a nice sequence of events dealing with the formation of the first quarks, the
first atoms and, in the end, with the formation of the Galaxies themselves. That sequence of events is very ...
"scientific", except it doesn't work. A quick search on the Internet for
"Universe, history"
is going to reveal many thorny aspects regarding the moments before and after
the Big Bang in general and, in
particular, about the formation of Galaxies, planetary systems, etc.
It is very interesting to note that before Time Zero we had a big bunch of
NOTHING which decided suddenly to explode with a Big Bang. We do not deny
there was absolutely NOTHING before Time Zero--that is, nothing from our
Atomic Universe--but we are not quite certain it was such a Big
Bang afterwards. Why not a first, tiny, Little Pop of a single quark, or even of one hydrogen proton? Of course, after that first,
timid pop of matter, many others could be heard/seen popping/flourishing up like ... popcorns!
|
 |
The most important aspect, however, is the initial state: the NOTHING itself. Yes, there was no matter, no space,
and no time, but that is only from our point of view, from this side of the now existing Atomic Universe. In the
other side, the Subatomic Universe, time was, and it has always
been, in its rightful place, and the Certitude
Factors were preparing for that first, Little Pop of matter. After Time Zero, our Atomic Universe came into
existence with matter, space, and with its own time. Following the Little Pop of atomic matter, the Subatomic
Primary Energies led to the formation and expansion of what would later became the "buds" of
the incredibly beautiful Galaxies we have today.
At the NASA website you can find a few pictures of Galaxies. No doubt
about it, there is nothing more beautiful in the Universe than the image of some
Galaxies and Nebulae; please take a look at
the Sombrero
Galaxy.
|
 |
|
The Subatomic Universe is the one responsible for many mysteries
connected to the formation of Galaxies, planetary systems, and of some
strange astronomical objects as are pulsars, neutron stars, black holes,
etc. Now, what is that intriguing Subatomic Universe? The most advanced theories
known officially today regarding the Subatomic (this is the next level
from quark further down) are the String Theory
and the M Theory. Both theories are very
interesting, developed from complex, advanced mathematical models but, again, they are not quite consistent.
As a note only, Einstein didn't agree with the Big Bang Theory: he considered the Universe is a static system.
Wow, a static system! That is stunningly perplexing since it came from someone who has postulated
the Theory of
Relativity! Anyway, there are many other theories regarding the birth of the Universe, although none is as popular
as the Big Bang one.
The scenario presented graphically in this page (the two pictures above) is based on
a few theories
from MERCY, and THREE STORIES:
theories that are far more advanced than anything ever postulated in the
entire History of our Civilization--and there is a lot more to come in
our future SF books!
*** |
First published on September 6, 2004
© Corollary Theorems Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| |
|
 |
Send your
comments regarding this page using support@corollarytheorems.com
Page last updated on:
May 11, 2011
© Corollary Theorems Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page valid according to W3C
|
|
|
