 Each government on our planet today is desperate to get/grab whatever belongs to the
"unexplained", to "UFOs", or to some technological or historical secrets. The truth is,
"desperate" is not the right word; they are capable of ANYTHING to get those artifacts, secrets,
whatever. The idea is, each country/nation strives to achieve "technological supremacy" and
"absolute power". Socially, that is understandable. In the same time, the official propaganda is, there
are no unexplained things, there are no UFOs, and technological/historical secrets do not exist; everything is
just ordinary and normal.
Well, that "natural" social mentality is due to a very low "real average social intelligence"
existing today in our societies, everywhere. It is possible in about 100 years from this time one country on our
planet will achieve that "total technological supremacy", therefore it will enslave all other nations.
Well, if that moment will become reality, people are going to discover that technological power is not sufficient;
better said, technological power is far from anything. If you have little patience, you may discover what is way,
way greater than technology in these Amazing Articles pages.
*
It is not easy to decide on the most interesting topic for a first article. Anyway, after many
painful sacrifices, we settled for the birth of our Universe: the great Big Bang itself! The Big-Bang theory
started spreading among the scientists at the beginning of the twentieth century, after the English translation of
the Sanskrit Veda poems was published in 1899.
The "Big Bang" theory says: the Universe has a cyclic evolution. It starts with a
single, invisible point--named a "singularity" by some scientists--which contains the entire mass of the
Universe, including space and time. Next, the little invisible point explodes with a "Big Bang", then
matter, space, and time appear as we know them. Of course, matter appears as basic atomic particles/components at
first, and they need to group themselves together to form atoms, molecules, stars, planetary systems, and in the
end the galaxies. The Universe continues to expand for billions of years, then it will stop its motion; next, it
will start collapsing. The collapsing of the Universe continues until a new singularity point is formed, and a new
cycle is "bound" to start again.
The "Big Bang" theory was explained the first time after the Indian Veda poems were translated and
published in 1899. Please note this: that translation was performed according to our mechanical level of
understanding the Universe. In other words, we understand the science of the Universe only if it is explained
"mechanically". This is our actual level of Civilization: mechanical! In reality, things are far from
being mechanical in nature, and there is no doubt this aspect is very well documented in the original Veda poems.
The problem is, we cannot understand that; therefore, the first translators have added little "mechanical
touch" to the entire picture, in order to make some sense--or any sense.
Note that the Big-Bang theory does not hold water, and many scientists know it very well. Today, when a new
star is born, there is no Bang at all. Fact is, wave sounds do not travel through vacuum--they cannot do it.
Therefore, why should it be such a Big Bang the very first time when there was actually no space/vacuum at all?
Now, if it was a Big Bang or not, this is totally not important. However, this absurd name reflects perfectly well
our capability to understand reality. A "Big Bang" suggests a mechanical explosion, and this
"mechanical picture" makes "total" sense to most of us.
Most of the scientists agree today with the Big Bang theory. Even more, famous ancient texts as are
Ramayana and Mahabharata prove to us that fine Ladies and Gentlemen were well familiar with the Big Bang theory
7000 .. 10000 years ago! Now, the real beauty about this Big Bang is, it is not quite clear regarding particular
aspects, and that is very good news, because it leaves plenty of room for further investigations.
One thing is certain: there was an initial moment in time when our Universe appeared (that is the Big Bang
moment), and we named it, Time Zero. Before Time Zero, most scientists consider there was NOTHING, meaning, no
matter, no space, and no time. Most scientists consider the entire mass of the Universe was concentrated in a
single, invisible point, named--poetically only, without any scientific fundament--a singularity. To us, the
NOTHING hypothesis makes far more sense.
Further form Time Zero, there is a nice sequence of events dealing with the formation of the first quarks, the
first atoms and, in the end, with the formation of the galaxies themselves. That sequence of events is very ...
"scientific", except it doesn't work. A quick search on the Internet for "Universe, history"
is going to reveal many thorny issues regarding the moments before and after Big Bang in general and, in
particular, about the formation of galaxies, planetary systems, etc.
It is very interesting to note that before Time Zero we had a big bunch of NOTHING which decided suddenly to
explode in a Big Bang. We do not deny there was absolutely NOTHING before Time Zero--that is, nothing from our
"Atomic Universe"--but we are not quite certain it was such a Big Bang afterwards. Why not a first,
single, "Little Pop" of a single quark, or even of one hydrogen proton? Of course, after that first,
timid pop of matter, many others could be heard/seen popping/flourishing up like ... popcorns!
The most important aspect, however, is the initial state: the NOTHING itself. Yes, there was no matter, no space,
and no time, but that is only from our point of view, from this side of the now existing Atomic Universe. In the
other side, the Subatomic one, time was, and it has always been, in its rightful place, and the "Certitude
Factors" were preparing for that first, Little Pop of matter. After Time Zero, our Atomic Universe came into
existence with matter, space, and with its own time. Following the Little Pop of atomic matter, the Subatomic
"Primary Energies" led to the formation and expansion of what would later became the "buds" of
the incredibly beautiful galaxies we have today. (At NASA website you can find few pictures of galaxies. No doubt
about it, there is nothing more beautiful in the Universe than the image of some galaxies; please take a look at
the Sombrero galaxy.)
The Subatomic is the one responsible for many mysteries connected to the formation of galaxies, planetary systems,
and to strange astronomical objects as are pulsars, neutron stars, black holes, etc. Now, what is that intriguing
Subatomic? The most advanced theories known officially today regarding the Subatomic (this is the next level from
quark further down) are the "String Theory" and the "M Theory". Both theories are very
interesting, and developed from complex, advanced mathematical models but, again, they are not quite consistent.
As a note only, Einstein didn't agree with the Big Bang Theory: he considered the Universe is a static system.
Wow, a static system! That is stunningly perplexing, since it came from someone who has postulated the Theory of
Relativity! Anyway, there are many other theories regarding the birth of the Universe, although none is as popular
as the Big Bang.
***
First published on September 6, 2004
© Corollary Theorems Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
